[This Tuesday an estimated 800-1000 evangelical leaders and activists will converge on New York City for a behind-closed-doors meeting with the presumptive Republican nominee for president, Donald Trump.  Prominent evangelicals helping to orchestrate the gathering include Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council; Penny Nance, CEO of Concerned Women for America; and former presidential candidate Ben Carson.  Trump will deliver a prepared address and then take questions.  Some in the audience will have already made up their minds, but many will be coming to New York still uncertain about whether, or how strongly, to support the real estate magnate and TV celebrity.]

Brothers and Sisters:

Tomorrow you will be in the audience when Donald Trump makes a case for why American evangelicals should support his bid for the highest office in the nation.  You will surely be traveling to New York City with honorable motives and high ideals, as well as a solemn appreciation of the magnitude of the task before you.  My prayer is that God will grant you wisdom and discernment and courage and faith.  Here perhaps I should stop, but I will be bold to offer two exhortations that I also pray you will take to heart.

Know that I offer these pleas sympathetically.  I am a committed evangelical: born and raised in the Bible Belt, connected with evangelical churches for the past half-century, currently on the faculty at an evangelical college.  In terms of political convictions, I have been a life-long conservative.  If we could sit down and talk together, I think there’s much we would agree about.  And in the end, I hope that we could agree on the wisdom of two simple principles as you determine how you will report to your organizations and congregations after Tuesday’s gathering.

First, be honest—with us and with yourselves.  If after meeting with Trump you are convinced that evangelicals should support the presumptive Republican nominee, tell us that, without minimizing the monumental risks of such a step.  Don’t encourage us to have faith in the meaningless assurances he will undoubtedly offer.  Don’t tell us that, after hearing him “share his heart,” you now believe in him.  Above all, don’t paper over his faults or dismiss them as trivial.  Look us squarely in the eye and candidly acknowledge his misogyny, his religious bigotry, his adulation of power, his contempt for constitutional constraints, his multiple marriages, his questionable business practices, and his casino empire.  Then make your case as to why should support him anyway.

Second, understand that you must be teachers as well as leaders.  Like it or not, many of us will learn what it means to be responsibly engaged Christian citizens from your example.  The religious groups that peopled this country in the 17th and eighteenth centuries generally had well developed theologies of political engagement.  But few evangelicals in America today have such historical resources to draw from.  The Christian traditions that have given evangelicalism its vitality in recent generations have been individualistic, pietistic, and theologically unreflective in their approach to politics.  Consequently, we need to know how to think more than what to think.  In the long run, finding out who you will vote for in November is less important than uncovering the scriptural precepts and theological principles that guide your decision.  Tell us what those are.  And if you can’t identify any, concede that your decision is personal and pragmatic.

But it is not only other Christians who will be scrutinizing your response carefully and learning from it.  The rest of American society will be studying you as well.  They have already witnessed Republican leaders closing ranks around Trump in the interest of party unity, brushing aside his numerous moral failings as inconsequential eccentricities.  They are now looking to see how the Church of Christ will respond.  Will we come across to them as just another interest group jockeying for political advantage, a voting bloc offering to exchange political support for political favors?  Or will they see something strange and different—patient, principled, persevering, and loving, seeking the good of our neighbors but understanding that our citizenship is in heaven?

All of which is to say that the most important thing at stake in evangelicals’ response to Donald Trump is neither the future of the Republican Party nor the prosperity and power of the United States, although both may be in jeopardy.  Each of you is poised, inescapably, on the cusp of a teaching moment.  As you listen to Donald Trump and consider how best to advise your congregations and organizations about his candidacy, ask yourselves this question: what will my honest reasoning teach to the church and about the church?



  2. Pingback: MEDITATIONS FOR THE VOTING BOOTH | Faith and History


  4. Tom McClelland

    Dr. McKenzie,

    Thank you for posting this “Open Letter”! There is much about this election cycle that is frightening – starting with the two presumptive nominees. As one of your other posters noted, both Clinton & Trump carry a weight of baggage with them that begs the question – what makes you feel you are qualified for the office of President of the United States?

    However, at this point – that appears to be our choices.

    But, the more frightening aspect of this cycle, for me, is the seeming loss of thoughtful consideration and measure being applied by many so-called Christian leaders to the candidates – and the apparently willingness to gloss over one candidate’s deficiencies because of a stated hatred for the policies and positions of the other candidate.

    Based on the statements and writings of many of the leaders who will meet with Mr. Trump this week, the primary reason given to vote for him – or to support him – is because he is “not Hillary Clinton.”

    As a believer who is firmly in the camp of covenantal, reformed thought, I wholly trust and believe that our God is, even now, sovereign over the affairs of men, including presidential elections. But, I fear, in this instance, just as He once did for Israel, he will give us what we demand rather than what we need (c.f., Saul’s selection as king over Israel).


  5. Tracy, thanks for this humble yet serious appeal.

  6. Julie Randolph

    Right on, R.T. McKenzie!

  7. Jack Be Nimble

    I suspect that how evangelical leaders respond to Trump’s pleas for support may well depend on how they view what a Hillary Clinton presidency might look like. Millions of Americans will be voting based on the “lesser or two evils” assessment of this election. The option of not voting is beginning to look attractive to some evangelicals because they do not want to put either candidate in office. But, of course, unless the stop Trump movement can turn a number of delegates toward another candidate in the Republican Convention, Trump will be nominated. So will Hillary who has baggage of a different sort than Trump. Scripture tells us that God is sovereign and He sets up rulers and takes them down. All we can say is that the outcome of the election will conform to God’s sovereign will as He works out His purposes for the American nation, purposes that may well be very obscure to evangelical leaders and the rest of us as we wrestle with the decision we must make.

  8. 20 June 2016

    “Look us squarely in the eye and candidly acknowledge his misogyny, his religious bigotry, his adulation of power, his contempt for constitutional constraints, his multiple marriages, his questionable business practices, and his casino empire. Then make your case as to why [you] should support him anyway.”

    Tracy, with that list you make it so easy for any of them not to support Trump. I wonder if there would be any who would disagree with you on your characterization of him? Or if they do agree how would they downplay the significance of any or all of them?

    We’ll see…

    Gary Hotham

    • Hi, Gary: You’re right that there are some, perhaps many, who would disagree with that characterization. As you say, we’ll see.

    • I’m bothered by the attitude of these evangelical leaders. They, as Christian leaders, are not forgiving of Trump’s past mistakes. They are holding his PAST views against him, not accepting the man as he is today. Have they never changed their viewpoints, their lifestyle? Are we to assume they have always been perfect, and so demand absolute perfection in their candidate? There is no perfect candidate that anyone will agree with 100%. These leaders are coming off as extremely judgemental, self-righteous, unwilling to forgive. They must also remember that we are not choosing a church leader here; we are choosing the leader of our nation. My biggest question is, if they will not support Trump, who will they support? Hillary?! It’s time for them to get off their high horse and realize that God works through many individuals, imperfect people. God has a plan and the next president will fit into His plan, regardless of the evangelical leaders snubbing Trump.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s