THE DANGER OF RELIGIOUS ALLIANCES WITH SECULAR POWER–A TIMELY WARNING FROM A LONG TIME AGO

It was a glorious afternoon in Wheaton and I took advantage of the perfect weather to spend several hours at St. James Farm, a former horse and dairy farm that is now a 600-acre public forest preserve.  I took a cold drink and my copy of Democracy in America and had a grand time.

I’ll return in a day or two to my series on the aphorism “America is great because America is good,” but I was so struck by a passage from Tocqueville on a different subject—in this case, lines that the Frenchman actually wrote—that I had to share them with you right away.  The passage in question comes from a section in vol. I titled “On the Principal Causes of Religion’s Power in America.”

Alexis de Tocqueville, circa 1850

Alexis de Tocqueville, circa 1850

Writing in the 1830s, Tocqueville begins by noting that European philosophers had been predicting since the eighteenth century that religious zeal would inevitably fade as liberty and enlightenment increased.  The opposite pattern seemed to hold in America, however.  In America Tocqueville found “the freest, most enlightened men living in the happiest circumstances to be found anywhere in the world,” and yet religion also seemed to flourish.  “When I arrived in the United States,” he relates, “it was the country’s religious aspect that first captured my attention.”

Surprised by this discovery, Tocqueville interviewed a variety of clergymen about what he had discerned, and “to a man, they assigned primary credit for the peaceful ascendancy of religion in their country to the complete separation of church and state.”  This prompted him to ask further questions about the role that the clergy played in America.  “As I listened,” Tocqueville related,

I learned that in God’s eyes no one is damnable for his political views so long as those views are sincere, and that there is no more sin in erring about matters of government than in being mistaken about how to build a house or plow a furrow.

Interesting.  Tocqueville continues,

I saw them [the clergy] carefully mark their distance from, and avoid contact with, all parties as zealously as it if were a matter of personal interest.

In the rest of the chapter, Tocqueville compares religion’s great vitality in the United States with its moribund state in France and explains the difference by comparing the separation of church and state that existed in the United States with the close alliance of church and state that had characterized France prior to the French Revolution.  When French advocates of political liberty had struck at the French monarchy, they had naturally seen the Catholic Church as an ally of the Crown and an enemy of the cause of freedom.  He then generalizes,

When religion allies itself with a political power, it increases its power over some but gives up hope of reigning over all.  As long as a religion rests solely on sentiments that console man in his misery, it can win the affection of the human race.  But when it embraces the bitter passions of this world, it may be forced to defend allies acquired through interest rather than love, and it must reject as adversaries men who love it still even as they do battle with its allies.  Religion cannot share the material might of those who govern without incurring some of the hatred they inspire. . . . But when religion seeks the support of worldly interests, it becomes almost as fragile as any temporal power.  Alone, it can hope for immortality; linked to ephemeral powers, it shares their fortune and often falls with the fleeting passions that sustain them.

I don’t know about you, but when Tocqueville writes of Christians being “forced to defend allies acquired through interest rather than love,” my mind goes to the awkward (and I believe horribly misguided) alliance of evangelicals with Donald Trump.  Tocqueville believed that such an alliance had greatly weakened the spiritual influence of French Christians.  “In Europe,” he writes.

Christianity allowed itself to become the close ally of temporal powers.  Today those powers are collapsing, and Christianity finds itself buried, as it were, beneath their debris.  A living thing, it has been lashed to cadavers.

Democracy in America is not Scripture and Alexis de Tocqueville was not a prophet, yet this passage has me wondering what long-term effect evangelical leaders’ support for Donald Trump will have on the Church’s witness to a lost world.

St James Farm II

4 responses to “THE DANGER OF RELIGIOUS ALLIANCES WITH SECULAR POWER–A TIMELY WARNING FROM A LONG TIME AGO

  1. 11 August 2016

    1/ Tocqueville said:
    “But when religion seeks the support of worldly interests, it becomes almost as fragile as any temporal power.”

    I think that is a very important insight and can’t be emphasized too much. The wrong place to put one’s trust in as a believer.

    2/ I think it wise for a Christian institution or leader such as a pastor not to throw their support behind a particular political party or candidate but what about them critiquing any of the positions that have been taken by that political party or candidate which they do not think represents a Christian world view? Is silence the best policy in those situations?

    3/ re: “I learned that in God’s eyes no one is damnable for his political views so long as those views are sincere,…”.

    I’m not quite so sure I agree with that. I think some political views could be sins no matter how sincere they are held! Like ethnic cleansing.

  2. Hello Tracy –
    I’ve really been enjoying your Tocqueville series of posts. There are a number of editions out there – some abridged, some whole, some with commentary or annotations, etc. Is there an edition you’ve been reading and using and can recommend?
    Thanks,
    Phil LeDuc

    • Dear Phil, Good to hear from you! I hope you are well. I haven’t systematically surveyed all the options, and there are quite a few, as you note. The first edition I read–many years ago now–was published by Harper and Row, edited by J.P. Meyer, with translation by George Lawrence. It has no editorial introduction and minimal annotation, just gives the reader Tocqueville. The edition I just finished reading is one of the most recent translations–published by the Library of America, edited by Olivier Zunz with translation by Arthuer Goldhammer. Almost as recent is an edition done by the University of Chicago Press with translation and editing by Mansfield and Winthrop. Any of those would be fine. If you would like more background and context for the work, I have two suggestions: 1) Bedford Books of St. Martin’s Press has a greatly abridged edition (it’s more accurate to think of it as selections culled from the book) with a nice scholarly introduction by historian Michael Kammen. It’s a good introduction to major themes in the larger work. Or if you have the time, consider reading Democracy in America in its entirety, but preface it by reading James Schliefer’s “The Chicago Companion to Tocqueville’s Democracy in America,” which is a short, book-length introduction. It provides a lot of biographical material on Tocqueville, puts the work in the context of French history, identifies major themes and key concepts, etc. I found it very accessible and extremely helpful, but it is not meant to be a substitute for reading the real thing. I hope this helps!

  3. Great points, thanks. It is certainly a strange alliance between Trump and evangelicals. Just baffling.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s